THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN QUARTER-LIFE CRISIS AND THE LEVEL OF RELIGIOSITY IN FINAL-YEAR STUDENTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to determine whether there is a relationship between quarter-life crisis and religiosity. This study used a quantitative approach with a correlational type of research. The population in the survey was final-year students of the Faculty of Da'wah and Communication, which amounted to 638 students. From the sampling technique used using Slovin, there was a sample of 87 students. This study takes a quantitative approach with correlational research that aims to determine how two variables are connected. This field study uses questionnaire-based data collection methods and documentation, with 25 statement items from each instrument. The design of this study is to correlate Pearson product moments. The results showed that the average student experienced a quarter-life crisis and a moderate level of religiosity. Meanwhile, the Correlation test results show a strong relationship between the quarter-life crisis and the level of religiosity in final-year students of the Faculty of Da'wah and Communication. The relationship is determined based on the interpretation of the correlation coefficient, which is in the range of 0.60-0.799—testing the data hypothesis in research that has been done, where the higher the quarter-life crisis experienced, the higher the level of religiosity in students.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".