MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403241424 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.052010

Signal processing and spectral modeling for the BeEST experiment

2025· article· en· W4403241424 on OpenAlexafffund
I. Kim, C. Bray, Andrew A. Marino, Caitlyn Stone-Whitehead, Amii Lamm, Ryan Abells, Pedro Amaro, Adrien Andoche, R. Cantor, David R. Diercks, S. Fretwell, A.S. Gillespie, Mauro Guerra, Ad Hall, Cameron N. Harris, Jackson T. Harris, Calvin Hinkle, L. Hayen, Paul-Antoine Hervieux, G. B. Kim, K. G. Leach, A. Lennarz, Vincenzo Lordi, Jorge Machado, David McKeen, X. Mougeot, F. Ponce, C. Ruiz, Amit Samanta, J. P. Santos, J. Smolsky, J. B. Taylor, Joseph Templet, S. Upadhyayula, Louis K. Wagner, W. K. Warburton, Benjamin Waters, S. Friedrich

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityTRIUMF
FundersEuropean Metrology Programme for Innovation and ResearchPacific Northwest National LaboratoryLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryU.S. Department of EnergyGordon and Betty Moore FoundationLaboratory Directed Research and DevelopmentFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsSIGNAL (programming language)PhysicsSignal processingSensitivity (control systems)Data processingPhase (matter)NeutrinoFlexibility (engineering)Energy (signal processing)RecoilComputational physicsComputer scienceNuclear physicsElectronic engineeringDigital signal processingComputer hardwareEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Beryllium Electron capture in Superconducting Tunnel junctions (BeEST) experiment searches for evidence of heavy neutrino mass eigenstates in the nuclear electron capture decay of $^{7}\mathrm{Be}$ by precisely measuring the recoil energy of the $^{7}\mathrm{Li}$ daughter. In Phase III, the BeEST experiment has been scaled from a single superconducting tunnel junction (STJ) sensor to a 36-pixel array to increase sensitivity and mitigate gamma-induced backgrounds. Phase III also uses a new continuous data acquisition system that greatly increases the flexibility for signal processing and data cleaning. We have developed procedures for signal processing and spectral fitting that are sufficiently robust to be automated for large datasets. This article presents the optimized procedures before unblinding the majority of the Phase III dataset to search for physics beyond the standard model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.444 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207