MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4403252312 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2023-0243

Nonminimal coupling holographic superconductors

2024· article· en· W4403252312 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mahya Mohammadi, Ahmad Sheykhi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsSuperconductivityHolographyCoupling (piping)Theoretical physicsCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanicsQuantum electrodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We explore a holographic superconductor model in which a real scalar field is nonminimally coupled to a gauge field. We consider several types of the nonminimal coupling function h(ψ) including exponential, hyperbolic (cosh), power-law, and fractional forms. We investigate the influences of the nonminimal coupling parameter α on condensation, critical temperature, and conductivity. We can categorize our results in two groups. In the first group, conductor/superconductor phase transition is easier to occur for larger values of α, while in the second group stronger effects of the nonminimal coupling makes the formation of scalar hair harder. Although the real and imaginary parts of conductivity are impressed by different forms of h(ψ), they follow some universal behaviors such as connecting with each other through Kramers–Kronig relation in ω → 0 limit or the appearance of gap frequency at low temperatures around ωg ∼ 8 Tc, which shifts to larger values by increasing the strength of α. Among all forms of h(ψ) we observe that h(ψ) = 1 + αψ2 gives us better information in wide range of nonminimal coupling constant and temperature. Choosing the best form of h(ψ), we construct a family of solutions for holographic conductor/superconductor phase transitions to discover the effect of the hyperscaling violation when the gauge and scalar fields are nonminimally coupled. we find that the critical temperature increases for higher effects of hyperscaling violation θ and nonminimal coupling constant α. By increasing these two parameters, we obtain lower values of condensation which means that conductor/superconductor phase transition will acquire easier. Furthermore, we understand that the hyperscaling violation affects the conductivity σ of the holographic superconductors and changes the expected relation in the gap frequency. Some universal behaviors like infinite DC conductivity are observed. In addition, we consider a five-dimensional Gauss–Bonnet (GB) black hole with a flat horizon. We find out that the critical temperature decreases for larger values of GB coupling constant, λ, or smaller values of nonminimal coupling constant, α, which means that the condensation is harder to form. Moreover, we study the electrical conductivity in the holographic setup. We observe that the gap frequency shifts to larger values for stronger λ, and becomes flat by increasing α.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physics→Same topicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics→French-language works237,207→