MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403258524 · doi:10.53063/synsint.2024.43231

Synthesis of molybdenum carbide using mechanochemical and thermal approaches

2024· article· en· W4403258524 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSynthesis and Sintering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced materials and composites
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMolybdenumCarbideMaterials scienceMetallurgyThermalThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The carbothermic reduction of MoS2 using Mg, an efficient sulfur scavenger, was carried out by two very different routes, i.e., mechanochemical reaction and heat treatment. The thermodynamic calculation results show that Mo2C and MgS are the phases formed when the elements are combined, and carbothermic reduction of molybdenite takes place. XRD analysis data indicates no reaction occurred at 1, 2, and 5 h of milling by the mechanochemical method, and the initial phases MoS2, Mg, and C were identified. On the other hand, after 7 hours of milling, Mo2C and MgS phases finally emerged. Through heat treatment, the desired Mo2C and MgS phases were successfully prepared with the crystal diffraction spots obvious at 700, 800, and 900 °C, respectively. Both of these methods produced powders which were then washed with a 10% 1M HCl solution, and as a result, a reasonable yield of pure molybdenum carbide was obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.431

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it