MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403260951 · doi:10.32725/oph.2024.003

Claudia Felicitas of Austria through the Lens of Christoph Traut's Funeral Sermon of 1676

2024· article· en· W4403260951 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpera Historica · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCentral European and Russian historical studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Historical Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSermonArtHistoryTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study deals with the content analysis of the funeral oration delivered by the court preacher Christoph Traut at the funeral of the late empress Claudia Felicitas, second wife of Leopold I, in the Augustinian Church in Vienna on 19 May 1676. The sermon itself was subsequently printed in Latin and German by the court printer Johann Christoph Cosmerovius. Through his comprehensive verbal narrative, the learned clergyman, originally from Bavaria, sought to honour the memory of the deceased, to shape and spread her generally positive posthumous image, to preserve it for future generations and to place the late empress in the context of the carefully crafted history of the Habsburg dynasty. The author’s contribution therefore focuses on the socio-historical role of the surviving sermon, in particular on a detailed analysis of the communication schemes and topoi used in relation to the posthumous (re)presentation and mediatization of Claudia Felicitas of Austria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it