Effect of Pressure on the Linear Friction Welding of a Tool Steel and a Low‐Alloy Carbon Steel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the effect of pressure (burn‐off and forging) on the mechanical properties of the joint between a wear‐resistant tool steel and a low‐alloy steel using linear friction welding. The authors have previously demonstrated the feasibility of joining these dissimilar materials, but the impact of pressure on the mechanical properties of the bimaterial joint remains unclear. To address this, weld samples are prepared using different pressures and are characterized through microstructural analysis, microhardness, tensile testing, and fractography. The results show that the strength of the joint between the wear‐resistant tool steel and the low‐alloy carbon steel increases as the pressure increases up to a certain point, after which a decrease is observed. The highest joint strength is achieved at a pressure of 360 MPa. The microhardness profile measurement reveals a distinct transition zone at the interface between the two materials, with varying hardness values. The hardness of the low‐alloy carbon steel increases near the interface, while that of the wear‐resistant tool steel decreases. This transition zone is found to be narrower at higher pressures. Microstructural characterization shows that the grain structure near the interface differs from that of the starting base materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".