MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403266504 · doi:10.3397/in_2024_3689

A sound insulation prediction tool and LCA: A comparative study considering different wooden assemblies

2024· article· en· W4403266504 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNOISE-CON proceedings · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHygrothermal properties of building materials
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoundproofingSound (geography)AcousticsEngineeringComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper aims to develop an acoustic design methodology for CLT floor assemblies using artificial neural networks approach by integration of life cycle assessment (LCA). 72 Lab-based measurements are used to develop the acoustic prediction tool. They are related to 29 different CLT-based floor assemblies. The weighted sound reduction index (Rw), and the weighted normalized impact sound pressure level (Ln,w) are estimated with an accuracy of 2 dB. Then a LCA study is conducted on assemblies that are used to test the network model. The acoustic performance and their environmental impacts are compared to highlight trends that may guide decision-makers in the design phase. This paper initially found that CLT-based floor assemblies generally increase the environmental impacts to achieve better acoustic insulation. However, a good sound attenuation can be reached by selecting suitable acoustic solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score0.918

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it