MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403266520 · doi:10.3397/in_2024_3575

Setting up light and noise maps to define the contours of a reserve of darkness and silence in Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada

2024· article· en· W4403266520 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jérôme BISSON, Sabrina CôTé, Henri CURRY, William FAUTEUX, Jérémie HATIER, Othmane LABSIR, Léa RIVARD, Audrey Guy, Gaëlle Belleau-Magnat, Philippe Apparicio, Johanne Roby, Olivier Robin

Bibliographic record

VenueNOISE-CON proceedings · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicRemote Sensing and Land Use
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeCégep de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSilenceDarknessNoise (video)Computer sciencePhysicsAcousticsOpticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urban sprawl brings cities closer to natural areas, making them cohabit is a significant environmental challenge. Densification can also increase light and noise pollution, negatively affecting human and biodiversity well-being. Grounded on a collaboration between a college and a university, this work combines brightness and noise maps to establish the contours of a reserve of darkness and silence in Sherbrooke's Mont-Bellevue Park (Québec, Canada). The light and sound environments of the city are mapped by the research team using two devices mounted on vehicles or bicycles: a multispectral and multidirectional brightness sensor and a sound level meter. Long-term and fixed-point light and noise measurements were also conducted to develop the mobile measurement protocol. Wind tunnel measurements in an anechoic chamber were finally used to determine the effect of travel speed on measured noise levels, showing that speeds of less than 15 km/h ensure unbiased acoustic measurements using a windscreen. Perspectives include using the Noise Capture application to provide crowdsourced and additional noise levels at fixed measurement points. The open-source Noise Modelling tool will provide us with calculated environmental noise maps to be compared with measured data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNOISE-CON proceedingsSame topicRemote Sensing and Land UseFrench-language works237,207