On the optical efficiency of collecting scattered radiation or telescopically imaging the measurement area in airborne acoustic pressure evaluations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Photon correlation is an optical method for calculating acoustic pressures through particle velocity measurements, involving the intersection of two focused Gaussian beams forming an interference fringe pattern. Particles within this measurement region exhibit sinusoidal motion as a result of a propagating acoustic pressure wave over the fringes, consequently scattering photons. This scattered radiation is then collected and processed to determine the particle velocity and then the acoustic pressure. In order to analyse the efficiency of the optical collection system, decoupled optical delivery configurations were implemented. In this case, instead of relying on particles moving over static fringes, moving fringes can be made to pass over an apparently static particle. To simulate this effect, a single laser beam can be modulated with a 3-D printed pattern simulating sinusoidal particle motion across fringes. Having established this alternative delivery system, suitable optical collection systems can be implemented, so that their efficiency can be analysed and assessed. This paper reports on the details of two such collection systems; analysing spherically propagated radiation and telescopically capturing the measurement area respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it