MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403268053 · doi:10.3397/in_2024_2156

Laboratory measurement of the effect of exposure to ship noise on mussels

2024· article· en· W4403268053 on OpenAlexaff
Soledad Torres, Paula ESTEVEZ-MARQUEZ, José M. F. Babarro, Elsa SILVA-CARIDE, David Santos-Domínguez, Luc A. Comeau, Miguel Gilcoto

Bibliographic record

VenueNOISE-CON proceedings · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersXunta de Galicia
KeywordsNoise (video)Environmental scienceFisheryMarine engineeringAcousticsEngineeringBiologyComputer sciencePhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis is a bivalve mollusc of high commercial interest, which frequently breeds in coastal areas with high levels of ship traffic noise. Studies on the effect of this stressor on mussels are scarce, which is why we set out to design a system to study the effect of ship noise on mussel behaviour (valve opening-closure rhythms). The proposed experimental set-up uses a high frequency non-invasive valvometry system to detect shell closure reactions related to instantaneous increases in sound level. The main findings are that mussels reacted to ship noise levels above 114 dB re 1μPa (63Hz-4kHz), that most reactions occurred within 13 s after a sudden increase in level, and that there does not appear to be a clear relationship between closure depth and noise level. Although mussels may not be sensitive to sound pressure but only to the associated particle movement, the results of this work contribute to highlighting the sensitivity of this species to noise, and the need to carry out experiments with a larger number of specimens and in conditions that allow the acoustic field to be reproduced more realistically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNOISE-CON proceedingsSame topicMarine animal studies overviewFrench-language works237,207