Soundscape augmentation as a nonpharmacological intervention to reduce the behavioural effect of dementia: a randomized controlled trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Soundscape is an important environmental factor that influences people's behaviour and well-being. People with dementia can benefit from a personalized soundscape to improve the behavioural and psychological syndrome of dementia. This paper is based on a single-blind, repeated-measure pilot randomized clinical trial of soundscape augmentation on the treatment effect of people with severe dementia. Participants were randomized to a personalized soundscape intervention delivered in their room in the morning and evening or treatment-as-usual, with two baseline weeks and four weekly post-randomization assessments of the primary and secondary behavioural outcomes. A linear mixed effects model showed that the soundscape intervention was possible and acceptable. There were improvements in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (resistance to care) and a significant reduction in aggression in the soundscape group. This study is the first pilot randomized controlled trial of a soundscape intervention for older adults with dementia to improve the behavioural and psychological syndrome of dementia. In this pilot study, soundscape augmentation was a feasible and effective non-pharmacological approach to reducing resistance and improving participants' behaviour. Further studies with larger samples are recommended to confirm our findings. Longitudinal studies are necessary to investigate the long-term effect of an augmented sonic environment on people with dementia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".