Quand l’injonction à la sollicitude appauvrit le travail émotionnel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Si la plupart des écrits universitaires sur le travail du care montrent que celui-ci peine à être reconnu socialement et économiquement, les organisations en charge de l’accompagnement à domicile des personnes âgées dépendantes semblent au contraire s’approprier la notion de care dans leurs pratiques et dans leur communication. Cela se traduit par la prescription d’une posture de bienveillance dans le travail des professionnelles de l’aide à domicile, s’inscrivant dans les attentes de la hiérarchie et du public vis-à-vis du savoir-être au travail. Mais au lieu de contribuer à la reconnaissance de la richesse du travail émotionnel des aide-ménagères et des auxiliaires de vie sociale, l’injonction à affirmer exclusivement des émotions positives semble au contraire appauvrir leur activité, en entrant en contradiction avec la nécessité que celles-ci peuvent éprouver à dissimuler leurs affects ou poser leurs limites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".