MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403269730 · doi:10.3397/in_2024_3071

Assessing the behavior of highly damped multilayered structures with controllable patches using condensation models

2024· article· en· W4403269730 on OpenAlexaff
Rafael da Silva Raqueti, Noureddine Atalla, Morvan Ouisse, Émeline Sadoulet-Reboul

Bibliographic record

VenueNOISE-CON proceedings · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCondensationMaterials scienceStructural engineeringPhysicsEngineeringThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents the finite element modeling of an adaptive sandwich structure that can be configured to exhibit various behaviors depending on the arrangement of the temperature fields in its core, which is made of a shape memory polymer with outstanding damping capacity. The sandwich structure is divided into patches corresponding to homogeneous temperature fields. Each patch is modeled as an equivalent thin plate using a condensation model and the effective properties are determined by preserving the real part of bending, shear (transverse) and extension (quasi-longitudinal) wavenumbers. The damping loss factor is estimated independently using the forced response from an analytical discrete model of the sandwich structure and the Power Input Method. Two different configurations of the sandwich structure are presented: in the first, the modal behavior of the sandwich structure is slightly affected; In the second, vibrations are reduced throughout the frequency range. The use of a suitable condensation model can be particularly interesting for solving optimization problems and determining optimal configurations. The behavior of the sandwich structure can be evaluated with reduced computational cost whenever an update of the temperature fields is required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score0.537

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNOISE-CON proceedingsSame topicComposite Structure Analysis and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207