Numerical study of acoustic metamaterial made of Helmholtz resonators with complex necks for low frequencies noise attenuation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, an acoustic metamaterial consisting of Helmholtz resonators with complex necks is proposed for low frequency noise reduction. The resonators are made of a cavity and a complex neck, which is a periodic succession of necks with small and large diameters. The acoustic attenuation performance of the proposed metamaterial design is demonstrated using finite element method. For such a shaped neck, the sound absorption coefficient presents multiple peaks. With a succession of N small and (N - 1) large neck diameters, N peaks in the sound absorption coefficient are obtained. By increasing the number of successions, the number of peaks increases. At the peaks, the surface acoustic impedance of the metamaterial nearly matches with the characteristic impedance of the air. This makes the sound absorption coefficient being nearly 100%. Keeping the same cavity volume, we increase the number of sound absorption peaks by the complex shape of the neck, while the classic Helmholtz resonator presents only one peak.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".