Les habitations de Thames Town comme lieux de rencontre d’univers culturels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article explore les modes décoratives de trois habitations du quartier d’architecture anglaise de Thames Town, situé dans la ville nouvelle de Songjiang en périphérie de Shanghai. Ces intérieurs, tous caractérisés par l’éclectisme et la co-présence de nombreux éléments tout autant rattachés par les habitants à des univers culturels occidentaux qu’à l’histoire chinoise, interrogent les modes contemporains d’habiter d’une partie de la population chinoise, ainsi que les représentations culturelles croisées et les formes d’interaction entre la Chine et l’Occident. L’analyse des décorations permet d’appréhender – au travers de la matérialisation (ou mise en objet) comme mode d’expression propre à l’univers domestique – des formes de création culturelle hybridée, d’appropriation spatiale des espaces de vie, ainsi que les processus d’identification individuelle et collective et d’organisation des rapports sociaux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".