MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403271785 · doi:10.4000/12ckl

Louis Vitalis avec Natasha Chayaamor-Heil, Architecture et sciences du vivant, Paris, Hermann, 2023

2024· article· fr· W4403271785 on OpenAlex
Marie-Pascale Corcuff

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de la recherche architecturale urbaine et paysagère · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsEspace pour la vie
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le biomimétisme est dans l’air du temps. Nombre d’architectes revendiquent ce mode de conception qui consiste à transposer les « solutions » adoptées par la nature à l’architecture. Plusieurs ouvrages ont contribué à cette vogue, comme Biomimetics in Architecture: Architecture of Life and Buildings, Biomimetics for Architecture & Design: Nature, Analogies, Technology, ou le plus diffusé, et le seul traduit en français : Biomimétisme et architecture, par Michael Pawlyn. Ces ouvrages sont des ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.010
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it