MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403272514 · doi:10.3397/in_2024_4234

Optimizing acoustic black hole structures for vibration control in beams: a comprehensive analysis

2024· article· en· W4403272514 on OpenAlex
Raef Chérif, Ahmed AGUIL

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNOISE-CON proceedings · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVibrationAcousticsVibration controlStructural engineeringMaterials scienceComputer sciencePhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acoustic black holes (ABH) have caught the attention of researchers because of their potential to absorb sound and control vibrations. This study presents an analytical framework that determines reflection coefficients in ABH structures. It focuses on implementing an acoustic black hole with a power-law tapered profile on beams. Moreover, this research investigates how various geometric shapes affect Damping Loss Factor (DLF) coefficients. This helps identify optimal approaches to optimize ABH structures based on specific requirements. The finite element method and a topology optimization solver were used to optimize various parameters systematically. The aim is to reduce weight and response, thereby improving the efficiency of ABH designs, especially in low-frequency insulation applications. The results demonstrate that ABH exhibits excellent performance in suppressing vibrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.405
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it