Bibliographic record
Abstract
CREMSi toute parole peut avoir une dimension performative, il en est dont la fonction est prcisment d avoir un impact sur l interlocuteur, impact positif ou ngatif.Un simple bonjour n est-il pas, quelle que soit la langue, un appel au bonheur, mme si le plus souvent ce n est pas conscientis ?Bons voeux, souhaits de rtablissement, paroles d encouragement sont noncs au quotidien avec, dans l intention de celui qui les prononce, la volont d agir sur le devenir de l nonciataire, de lui procurer du bonheur.Des voeux de bonne anne aux formules plus elliptiques telles accroche-toi la branche du tamarinier 1 , nonce au petit matin en rendant visite au malade alit a n qu il a ronte avec courage le mal qui le ronge, les formules propitiatoires rythment nos vies, du premier au dernier jour.Ces paroles bienveillantes entrent cependant en comptition avec d autres formules qui, nonces voix haute ou murmures, visent nuire leur nonciataire.Elles peuvent tre signales comme interdites 2 de prononciation et sont reconnues l inverse comme entranant le malheur.Les modalits de leur nonciation 1. Ce souhait est formul en boomu, langue gur parle par les Bwa vivant l est du Mali. 2. , 2008.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".