MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403273356 · doi:10.4000/127kw

Quantifier le genre dans les médias

2024· article· fr· W4403273356 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Laetitia Biscarrat, Marlène Coulomb‐Gully, David Doukhan, Cécile Méadel

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsQuantifier (linguistics)MathematicsArtHumanitiesPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le présent article se penche sur les défis méthodologiques que rencontre une étude internationale visant à mesurer la place des femmes dans l’information médiatique. Il s’appuie sur l’enquête de référence en la matière, le Global Media Monitoring Project (GMMP). Dépassant les résultats de l’enquête, accessibles par ailleurs, il s’agit d’abord de s’interroger sur les conditions de production des chiffres ici fournis, de proposer une analyse critique des résultats obtenus, d’élargir le questionnement dans une perspective intersectionnelle, en prenant en compte des corpus originaux jusqu’ici inexploités et, enfin, de s’interroger sur l’apport des intelligences artificielles en confrontant les processus de comptage manuels et automatisés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.382
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.089 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunicationSame topicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, GenderFrench-language works237,207