MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403275743 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.144507

Absence of a bulk thermodynamic phase transition to a density wave phase in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>UTe</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:math>

2024· article· lv· W4403275743 on OpenAlexaff
Florian Theuss, Avi Shragai, G. Grissonnanche, Luciano B. Peralta, Gregorio de la Fuente Simarro, Ian Hayes, Shanta Saha, Yun Suk Eo, Alonso Suarez, Andrea Capa Salinas, Ganesh Pokharel, Stephen D. Wilson, Nicholas P. Butch, Johnpierre Paglione, B. J. Ramshaw

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2024
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRare-earth and actinide compounds
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
FundersMaryland Quantum Materials CenterMaterials Research Science and Engineering Center, Harvard UniversityNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyGordon and Betty Moore FoundationOffice of ScienceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSuperconductivityCondensed matter physicsCharge (physics)Phase (matter)Phase transitionCharge density wavePhysicsSpectroscopyMaterials scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Superconductors often host multiple competing and intertwined orders, such as spin and charge density waves. Recent scanning tunneling microscopy measurements suggest that the heavy-fermion superconductor UTe${}_{2}$ has both Cooper pair and charge density waves (PDWs and CDWs, respectively). Using high-resolution resonant ultrasound spectroscopy, the authors find here no evidence for a thermodynamic phase transition to a bulk CDW state, also ruling out a bulk PDW. These measurements highlight the need to distinguish between bulk and surface physics in UTe${}_{2}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicRare-earth and actinide compoundsFrench-language works237,207