MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403277427 · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111163

Melanin-concentrating hormone promotes feeding through the lateral septum

2024· article· en· W4403277427 on OpenAlexafffund
Mikayla A. Payant, Anjali Shankhatheertha, Melissa J. Chee

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Ontario
KeywordsHormoneCell biologyEndocrinologyBiologyInternal medicineChemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Feeding is necessary for survival but can be hindered by anxiety or fear, thus neural systems that can regulate anxiety states are key to elucidating the expression of food-related behaviors. Melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) is a neuropeptide produced in the lateral hypothalamus and zona incerta that promotes feeding and anxiogenesis. The orexigenic actions of MCH that prolong ongoing homeostatic or hedonic feeding are context-dependent and more prominent in male than female rodents, but it is not clear where MCH acts to initiate feeding. The lateral septum (LS) promotes feeding and suppresses anxiogenesis when inhibited, and it comprises the densest projections from MCH neurons. However, it is not known whether the LS is a major contributor to MCH-mediated feeding. As MCH inhibits LS cells by MCH receptor (MCHR1) activation, MCH may promote feeding via the LS. We bilaterally infused MCH into the LS and found that MCH elicited a rapid and long-lasting increase in the consumption of standard chow and a palatable, high sugar diet in male and female mice; these MCH effects were blocked by the co-administration of a MCHR1 antagonist TC- MCH 7c. Interestingly, the orexigenic effect of MCH was abolished in a novel, anxiogenic environment even when presented with a food reward, but MCH did not induce anxiety-like behaviors. These findings indicated the LS as a novel region underlying orexigenic MCH actions, which stimulated and enhanced feeding in both sexes in a context -dependent manner that was most prominent in the homecage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueProgress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological PsychiatrySame topicRegulation of Appetite and ObesityFrench-language works237,207