MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403278303 · doi:10.1109/fpl64840.2024.00034

A Software-Programmable Neural Processing Unit for Graph Neural Network Inference on FPGAs

2024· article· en· W4403278303 on OpenAlexaff
Taikun Zhang, Andrew Boutros, Sergey Gribok, Kwadwo Boateng, Vaughn Betz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceField-programmable gate arrayArtificial neural networkInferenceSoftwareGraphComputer architectureArtificial intelligenceParallel computingEmbedded systemTheoretical computer scienceProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are a widely-used class of deep learning (DL) models for learning latent representations of graph-structured data for a variety of node/graph-level prediction tasks, some of which require real-time low latency inference. Most existing GNN accelerators rely on preprocessing input graphs on a host/embedded CPU to parallelize computations on different sub-graphs, making them unsuitable for real-time use cases. Others are extremely specialized streaming pipelines for only a specific type of GNN and therefore suffer from long FPGA bitstream compile times when the model is updated and cannot be used in applications that combine GNNs with other classes of DL models. In this work, we enhance the neural processing unit (NPU) FPGA overlay architecture, instruction set, and software stack to support a variety of GNN models. We achieve this without sacrificing the NPU flexibility; our enhanced NPU can be programmed purely through software to accelerate different GNNs or any of its originally supported DL workloads (e.g. MLPs, RNNs, GRUs, LSTMs). In addition, this flexibility enables our NPU software compiler to generate GNN kernels with different performance targets (throughput-optimized vs. latency-optimized) by exploiting different dimensions of compute parallelism on the same overlay architecture. Besides the flexibility benefits, our NPU implemented on an Intel Stratix 10 NX (14 nm) FPGA can process $7.8 \times$ more graphs per second at a similar latency on average compared to a state-of-the-art model-specific FPGA accelerator targeting real-time applications on an AMD Ultrascale+ same-generation FPGA. It also achieves 5.8 $\times$ higher throughput compared to an Nvidia RTX A6000 GPU (8 nm) and $2.6 \times$ lower latency than a state-of-the-art accelerator that combines CPU-based graph preprocessing with AMD Versal (7 nm) fabric and AI engine compute. Finally, we present a case study for using our enhanced NPU in real-time GNNbased multi-input multi-output (MIMO) antenna scheduling, highlighting that it meets the latency requirements of this task in 5G communication networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207