MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403278479 · doi:10.1109/fpl64840.2024.00036

SA4: A Comprehensive Analysis and Optimization of Systolic Array Architecture for 4-bit Convolutions

2024· article· en· W4403278479 on OpenAlexaff
Geng Yang, Jie Lei, Zhenman Fang, Jiaqing Zhang, J. C. Zhang, Weiying Xie, Yunsong Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSystolic arrayComputer scienceParallel computingBit (key)ArchitectureArithmeticComputer architectureComputational scienceMathematicsEmbedded systemVery-large-scale integrationComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many studies have demonstrated that 4-bit precision quantization can maintain accuracy levels comparable to those of floating-point deep neural networks (DNNs). Thus, it has sparked a keen interest in the efficient acceleration of such compressed DNNs, especially 4-bit convolutions, on edge devices. However, we observe that conventional systolic array (SA) architectures, widely adopted for DNN acceleration, fail to fully exploit the high computational density benefits of 4 -bit DSP packing. In this paper, we conduct the first comprehensive analysis of the integration of modern DSP packing techniques (specifically, 4-bit fully DSP packing) into the 4-bit systolic array design for convolutions. First, we introduce a row-temporal weight stationary 4-bit SA dataflow that complements the loop execution order inherent in 4-bit fully DSP packing in conventional SAs, which is called BaseSA. Next, we analyze the performance and resource efficiency of BaseSA, and identify two inefficiencies in the integration: 1) excessive LUT resource utilization that constraints the overall SA size, and 2) large latency gap to the theoretical optimum, due to various stalls in data supplies. To overcome these obstacles, we propose SA4: an HLS-based, customizable, and ultra-efficient hierarchical $\underline{\text { SA}}$ architecture optimized for 4 -bit convolutions. The core unit in SA4 is a delicately designed cost-effective SA unit (SAU), which 1) replaces the costly buffer-based data suppliers for activations and weights with shift-register-based ones, 2) replaces LUT-intensive FIFO connections between SA PEs (processing elements) with registers, and 3) replaces the finite state machines (FSM) and data unpacking logic inside each PE with a global FSM inside each SAU and a data splitter shared by a column of PEs. While such an SAU can only support a small spatial size for an SA due to its delicate design, we further scale it out using an array of SAUs. Experimental results show that our proposed SA4 achieves 1153.2 GOPS on the AMD-Xilinx Ultra96-V2 FPGA, with a $13.8 \times$ increase in GOPS/DSP efficiency and a $49 \times$ increase in GOPS/kLUTs efficiency compared to a straightforward SA and 4-bit DSP packing integration. Our SA4 project is open sourced here: https://github.com/Michaela1224/SA4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207