MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403283472 · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-52926-x

Three foci at the science-policy interface for systemic Sustainable Development Goal acceleration

2024· article· en· W4403283472 on OpenAlexafffund
Prajal Pradhan, Nina Weitz, Vassilis Daioglou, Gabriel Medeiros Abrahão, Cameron Allen, Geanderson Ambrósio, Frederike Arp, Furqan Asif, Thérèse Bennich, Tim G. Benton, Frank Biermann, Min Cao, Henrik Carlsen, Fang Chen, Min Chen, Michiel Daams, Jonathan Dawes, Shobhakar Dhakal, Elisabeth Gilmore, Klaus Hubacek, Yuanchao Hu, Wander Jager, Samir KC, Norman M. Kearney, Utkarsh Ashok Khot, Teun Kluck, Shridhar Kulkarni, Julia Leininger, Chaohui Li, Jing Li, Hermann Lotze‐Campen, Gonzalo Parrado-Hernando, Matteo Pedercini, Ram Kumar Phuyal, Christina Prell, Arpan Rijal, Vanessa Schweizer, Frans Sijtsma, Bjoern Soergel, Nathalie Spittler, Detlef P. van Vuuren, Anne Warchold, Eartha Weber, Birka Wicke, Oscar Widerberg, Rienne Wilts, Christopher Wingens, Chaoyang Wu, Qiang Xing, Yan Jin, Zifeng Yuan, Xin Zhou, Caroline Zimm

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSustainability and Climate Change Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooCarleton University
FundersHORIZON EUROPE Excellent ScienceEuropean CommissionUniversität für Bodenkultur WienWuhan UniversityDivision of Mathematical SciencesCAS Key Laboratory of Digital Earth ScienceHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammePeking UniversityUniversidad de ValladolidDepartment of Energy and Climate ChangeRheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität BonnHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesUniversity of BathVrije Universiteit AmsterdamChinese Academy of SciencesRadboud UniversiteitU.S. Department of EnergyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaInternational Institute for Applied Systems AnalysisRijksuniversiteit GroningenAsian Institute of TechnologyUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Bern
KeywordsOperationalizationInterface (matter)Sustainable developmentComputer scienceAccelerationProcess managementSystems engineeringBusinessEngineeringBiologyPhysicsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integrated and indivisible nature of the SDGs is facing implementation challenges due to the silo approaches. We present the three interconnected foci (SDG interactions, modeling, and tools) at the science-policy interface to address these challenges. Accounting for them will support accelerated SDG progress, operationalizing the integration and indivisibility principles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicSustainability and Climate Change GovernanceFrench-language works237,207