MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403289505 · doi:10.1016/j.saa.2024.125262

Evaluation of phenolics in the analysis of virgin olive oil using near infrared spectroscopy

2024· article· en· W4403289505 on OpenAlexaff
Xue Li, Concepción M. Díez, Hristofor Miho, Liangxiao Zhang, Peiwu Li, Feliciano Priego, Sara Oulbi, Elif Burcin Uyanik, Georgios Koubouris, Enzo Perri, Dolores Pérez‐Marín

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrochimica Acta Part A Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilHorizon 2020Spanish National Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and InnovationHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeHORIZON EUROPE Food, Bioeconomy, Natural Resources, Agriculture and EnvironmentMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación
KeywordsChemistryOlive oilInfrared spectroscopySpectroscopyInfraredFood scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Organic chemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Olive oil is an indispensable part of the diet in Mediterranean regions, and is appreciated worldwide for its sensory characteristics, combining a fine aroma and pleasant flavor with the high nutritional value of specific chemical compounds. However, making rapid measurements of phenolic compounds is a major challenge for the olive oil sector. The development of a new method based on near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy may be considered an important advance for the sector, as it is rapid, low-cost, non-contaminant and non-destructive. In this study, three different NIR instruments − one FT-NIR benchtop instrument (671.82–2702.70 nm) and two low-cost portable devices (900–1700 nm and 1350–2150 nm) − were used to analyze a collection of virgin olive oil samples from various Mediterranean regions. To predict both the individual and total concentration of phenols in the olive oil, four signal pretreatment methods and modified partial least squares regression analyses were employed to develop the predictive models. The results showed that the benchtop FT-NIR instrument performed better than the other portable instruments when measuring the phenolic compounds in virgin olive oil. The best models of hydroxytyrosol derivatives, tyrosol derivatives, total phenols and “EFSA phenols” showed R 2 cv values of 0.84, 0.85, 0.88 and 0.89, while the RPD cv values were 2.51, 2.61, 2.93 and 2.95, respectively. Meanwhile, for the portable NIR instruments, the prediction models for hydroxytyrosol derivatives, total phenols and “EFSA phenols”(the sum of the hydroxityrosol and tyrosol derivatives) showed R 2 cv values ranging between 0.75 and 0.81 and an RPD cv between 2 and 2.5. These results indicate the great potential of NIR, both with benchtop and portable devices, to detect phenolic compounds in virgin olive oil, which can guarantee the quality of virgin olive oil and thus aid progress in the olive oil industry. Moreover, this is the first published work to determine phenolic compounds in virgin olive oil using portable NIR instruments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpectrochimica Acta Part A Molecular and Biomolecular SpectroscopySame topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207