MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403295440 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2024.3477423

Self-Supervised Pretraining Framework for Extracting Global Structures From Building Point Clouds via Completion

2024· article· en· W4403295440 on OpenAlexaff
Hongxin Yang, Ruisheng Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topic3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer sciencePoint cloudPoint (geometry)Artificial intelligenceCompletion (oil and gas wells)Machine learningGeologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The exterior structural information of buildings are crucial for advancing smart city initiatives and reconstructing 3-D edifices. However, practical obstacles, such as sparse or incomplete building point clouds—stemming from various scanning angles or sensor limitations—present significant challenges. To mitigate the high costs and labor demands associated with data labeling, we introduce an innovative pretraining framework with self-supervised learning (SSL) that incorporates a modified point cloud completion (PCC) subnetwork to extract building structures. Specifically, the modified PCC subnetwork completes the original partial building point clouds by capturing both fine-grained and high-level semantic information of 3-D shapes. Following this, self-supervised feature extractor using a masked autoencoder (MAE) and a multiscale feature mechanism generates pointwise features from the completed building point clouds. We evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed integrated framework in extracting global structures using both established wireframe construction methods and our newly proposed edge point identification that incorporates a novel edge point regression loss. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that our modified PCC network reaches a 93.5% convergence rate that is higher than the results from competing methods. Our self-supervised pretraining framework extracts more accurate global structures with better loss convergence than traditional edge point identification loss designs. Finally, our combined framework improves performance for subsequent processes (such as wireframe construction and edge point identification) when using completed datasets instead of the original partial datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.997
Threshold uncertainty score0.695

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingSame topic3D Surveying and Cultural HeritageFrench-language works237,207