Joint Task Offloading and Resource Allocation Strategy for Hybrid MEC-Enabled LEO Satellite Networks: A Hierarchical Game Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The multi-access edge computing (MEC)-enabled low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite network is a promising approach to meet the growing ubiquitous diverse computation demands around the world. In this paper, a joint task offloading and resource allocation strategy is proposed for hybrid MEC-enabled LEO satellite networks, where two types of MEC tasks, namely delay-sensitive edgy-cloud task and data-and computation-intensive cloudy-edge task, are considered simultaneously. Specifically, we first design the cost functions for the two types of tasks, which take the delay-sensitive feature of edgy-cloud task and data-and computation-intensive characteristics of cloudy-edge task into consideration. Then, an overall terminal cost minimization problem is formulated for task offloading and resource allocation under the communication and computation capability constraints and the service delay requirements. In practice, terminals usually only care about their own costs, but satellites pursue the overall cost minimization of all the served terminals. Thus, considering the individual and collective rationality simultaneously, a two-level hierarchical game is constructed to solve the formulated problem. In the upper level, a hedonic coalition formation game is established, which enables each terminal to make the coalition selection and task offloading decision based on the designed coalition switch rule. In the lower level, the joint channel and power allocation in each coalition is first formulated as a noncooperative game to represent the individual rationality of each terminal. Then, each satellite performs the optimal computation resource allocation to maximize the coalition value with collective rationality. We prove that the Nash equilibrium (NE) for the noncooperative game exists and the coalition partition converges to a Nash stable state. Simulation results are provided to demonstrate the superiority of the proposed strategy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".