Experimental results of a YBCO bulk superconducting undulator magnetic optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The magnetic field optimization of RE-Ba-Cu-O (REBCO, <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mrow> <a:mi>RE</a:mi> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mtext>rare</a:mtext> </a:mrow> </a:math> earth) bulk superconducting undulators is a fundamental step toward their implementation in an accelerator driven photon source, like a synchrotron or a free electron laser. In this article, we propose a sorting algorithm to reduce the undulator’s phase error based on the reconstruction of the trapped current inside the bulks of a staggered array undulator. The results obtained with a YBCO short prototype field-cooled down to 10 K in a 10 T magnetic field are reported. Finally, its performance is critically discussed in light of 2D magnetic field maps of its individual components, obtained at <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:mrow> <c:msub> <c:mrow> <c:mi>LN</c:mi> </c:mrow> <c:mrow> <c:mn>2</c:mn> </c:mrow> </c:msub> </c:mrow> </c:math> after the magnetization tests. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".