MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4403301995 · doi:10.3390/jcm13206031

Postoperative Opioid Administration and Prescription Practices Following Hysterectomy in Two Tertiary Care Centres: A Comparative Cohort Study between Canada and Austria

2024· article· en· W4403301995 on OpenAlexaffabout
Judith Schiefer, Julian Marschalek, Djurdjica Djuric, Samantha Benlolo, Eliane M. Shore, Guylaine Lefebvre, Lorenz Kuessel, Christof Worda, H Husslein

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMedical prescriptionTertiary careHysterectomyCohortAdministration (probate law)OpioidCohort studyGeneral surgeryFamily medicineEmergency medicineGynecologySurgeryInternal medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: In light of the opioid epidemic, opioid-prescribing modalities for postoperative pain management have been discussed controversially and show a wide variation across geographic regions. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative pain treatment regimes. Methods: We performed a matched cohort study of women undergoing hysterectomy in Austria (n = 200) and Canada (n = 200). We aimed to compare perioperative opioid medications, converted to morphine equivalent dose (MED) and doses of non-opioid analgesic (NOA) within the first 24 h after hysterectomy, and opioid prescriptions at discharge between the two cohorts. Results: The total MED received intraoperatively, in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and during the first 24 h after surgery, was similar in both cohorts (145.59 vs. 137.87; p = 0.17). Women in the Austrian cohort received a higher MED intraoperatively compared to the Canadian cohort (117.24 vs. 79.62; p < 0.001) but a lower MED in the PACU (25.96 vs. 30.42; p = 0.04). The primary outcome, MED within 24 h in the postoperative ward, was markedly lower in the Austrian compared to the Canadian cohort (2.36 vs. 27.98; p < 0.001). In a regression analysis, only the variables “Country” and “mode of hysterectomy” affected this outcome. A total of 98.5% in the Canadian cohort were given an opioid prescription at discharge vs. 0% in the Austrian cohort. Conclusions: Our analysis reveals marked differences between Austria and Canada regarding pain management practices following elective hysterectomy; the significantly higher intraoperative and significantly lower postoperative MED administration in the Austrian cohort compared to the Canadian cohort seems to be significantly affected by each country’s cultural attitudes towards pain management; this may have significant public health consequences and warrants further research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.396 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Medicine→Same topicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment→French-language works237,207→