MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403304208 · doi:10.1063/5.0225733

Scalable ultra-strong light–matter coupling at THz frequencies using graded alloy parabolic quantum wells

2024· article· en· W4403304208 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Goulain, Mathieu Jeannin, Chris Deimert, T. Blaikie, Stefano Pirotta, A. Wright, Anna De Vetter, M. Mičica, S. Dhillon, Z. R. Wasilewski, R. Colombelli, Jean‐Michel Manceau

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStrong Light-Matter Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersHORIZON EUROPE European Research CouncilEuropean Commission
KeywordsPolaritonPhysicsTerahertz radiationCoupling (piping)ElectronAdiabatic processCondensed matter physicsQuantumOptoelectronicsCoupling strengthQuantum mechanicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We demonstrate scalable ultra-strong light–matter coupling with intersubband polaritons in a truly harmonic confining potential. The harmonicity grants immunity from electron–electron interactions, a protection guaranteed by the Kohn theorem, allowing the intersubband transition frequency to be lowered while keeping the light–matter interaction strength constant. In principle, this procedure permits increasing the relative coupling strength (η = ΩRabi/ω12) at will. We measure a record low intersubband transition at 1.24 THz and a lower polaritonic mode at 920 GHz, below the barrier of 1 THz. The system exhibits a η ratio of 0.24, fully in the ultra-strong coupling regime, and remains stable up to 78 K. This approach is valuable for future non-adiabatic quantum electrodynamic experiments at long wavelengths.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicStrong Light-Matter InteractionsFrench-language works237,207