Folklore (« Le discours esthétique dans la presse musicale française, 1900-1940. Une anthologie » / Mots clés, 5)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vers la fin du xix e siècle, l’étude du local, alors appelée « folk-lore », a été définie comme une « science du peuple français » qui permet la fabrication d’une nouvelle facette de l’identité nationale française. Les articles d’Henri Collet, de Mathilde Daubresse, de Marguerite Béclard d’Harcourt et de Luc Marvy donnent un aperçu de la place qu’occupait le folklore dans la presse musicale française de 1912 à 1935. Ils illustrent les différentes façons par lesquelles les musicographes français·e·s ont abordé le folklore après la course à la cueillette des chansons régionales. Loin de présenter un front commun sur son importance, certain·e·s souscrivent à l’idée ruraliste voulant que le folklore soit une musique authentique qui doit être sauvée alors que d’autres voient en lui un potentiel outil autant pour la création musicale que pour la définition d’un certain nationalisme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".