MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403307322 · doi:10.2147/copd.s466280

Temporal Dynamics of Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease During Stable Disease and Exacerbations: Review of the Mechanisms and Implications

2024· review· en· W4403307322 on OpenAlexaff
Sami O. Simons, Amy B. Heptinstall, Zoe Marjenberg, Jonathan C. Marshall, Hana Müllerová, Paola Rogliani, Clémentine Nordon, Nathaniel M. Hawkins

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of COPD · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulmonary diseaseDiseaseMedicineCardiologyIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are risk factors for severe cardiovascular (CV) events, with the risk remaining significantly elevated long after the symptomatic phase of the exacerbation. The pathophysiology underpinning the relationship between acute events of both COPD and CV diseases has been understudied. Our objectives were to review the mechanisms by which COPD exacerbations increase the risk of CV events and understand the temporality of this risk. Methods: A pragmatic and targeted literature review was conducted with a focus on identifying recent, high-impact papers up to June 2023, guided by insights from subject matter experts including pulmonologists and cardiologists. Results: A substantial number of inter-related mechanisms underpin the spiral of anatomical and functional deterioration of lung and heart affecting COPD patients during stable state. In turn, an exacerbation of COPD may trigger a CV event, during and beyond the symptomatic phase, due to ventilation/perfusion mismatch, oxygen supply-demand imbalance, oxidative stress, systemic inflammation, hypercoagulable state, dynamic hyperinflation, pulmonary hypertension, and sympathetic activation. However, no study was identified that explored the mechanisms by which an exacerbation confers a sustained risk of CV event. Conclusion: While our review identified multiple dynamic and interacting pathophysiological mechanisms during and after an exacerbation of COPD that contribute to increasing the risk of a wide range of cardiac events, little is known regarding the precise long-term mechanisms after acute exacerbation to explain the persistent increased CV event risk beyond the symptomatic phase. The temporal changes in static and dynamic substrates need further characterization to better understand the different risk factors and risk periods for a CV event following the onset of an exacerbation. Moreover, guideline-directed cardiopulmonary therapies should be implemented at every opportunity; preventing exacerbations and intensively treating traditional CV risk factors should be a focus in COPD management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.595
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of COPDSame topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchFrench-language works237,207