Bibliographic record
Abstract
Avec Pelléas et Mélisande de Maurice Maeterlinck, Claude Debussy faisait la rencontre d’une pièce de théâtre qui répondait en de nombreux points à ses attentes telles qu’il les exprimait déjà pendant ses études de composition. Mais, au-delà de son unique drame lyrique achevé, trouver ou concevoir un nouveau livret s’est révélé plus difficile que prévu, au point qu’il existe chez Debussy un « théâtre imaginaire », fait de dizaines de drames musicaux rêvés, mais jamais composés ou jamais terminés. Cet article se propose d’interroger les traces du travail de Debussy librettiste, en se penchant en particulier sur les sources du Diable dans le beffroi et de La chute de la maison Usher d’après Edgar Allan Poe. Cette étude de librettologie s’appuie sur les méthodes de la critique génétique afin de comprendre, à travers les transformations successives des livrets, les besoins spécifiques du compositeur pour concevoir une forme embrassant des questions tant littéraires, que dramatiques et musicales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".