MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403307612 · doi:10.1145/3665463.3678862

Ten Years of CHI PLAY: A Panel on the Past, Present, and Future of the Conference

2024· article· en· W4403307612 on OpenAlexaff
Regan L. Mandryk, Vero Vanden Abeele, Daniel Johnson, Lennart E. Nacke, Kathrin Gerling, Julian Frommel, Guo Freeman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Learning in Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The community-building efforts of many volunteers has grown the games and play community within SIGCHI into a vibrant and active group of researchers. Our dedicated conference—CHI PLAY—started in 2014 with the goals of being an inclusive, diverse, welcoming, and playful community that publishes the highest quality research papers and provides structured opportunities for networking, feedback, mentoring, and collaborative knowledge generation. In this panel, a group of CHI PLAY former, current, and future leaders reflects on the formation and care of the CHI PLAY conference over the last decade and shares their visions for the evolution of CHI PLAY over the next decade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Learning in EducationFrench-language works237,207