Maternal loss of 24-hydroxylase causes increased intestinal calcium absorption and hypercalcemia during pregnancy but reduced skeletal resorption during lactation in mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inactivation of 24-hydroxylase (CYP24A1) causes mild hypercalcemia in humans that becomes severe and life-threatening during pregnancy through unclear mechanisms. We studied Cyp24a1 null mice during pregnancy, lactation, and post-weaning. We hypothesized that Cyp24a1 nulls have a much greater increase in calcitriol during pregnancy and lactation, leading to markedly increased intestinal calcium absorption and reduced lactational bone loss. WT and Cyp24a1 null sisters were mated to Cyp24a1+/- males. Timepoints included baseline (BL), late pregnancy (LP), mid-lactation (ML), late lactation (LL), and weekly x4 weeks of post-weaning recovery (R1-4). Assessments included intestinal calcium absorption (IntCaAbs) by gavage of 45Ca, BMC by DXA, microCT of femurs, 3-point bending tests of tibias, serum hormones, serum and urine minerals, milk analysis, and intestinal gene expression. At LP, whole body BMC increased equally by ~12% in null and WT. Calcitriol was 2.5-fold higher in nulls vs WT, accompanied by 3-fold increased IntCaAbs, hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria, and 6.5-fold higher FGF23. PTH was suppressed in both. Twenty percent of null dams died during delivery but their serum calcium at LP did not differ from Cyp24a1 nulls that survived. At ML, calcitriol, IntCaAbs, and FGF23 declined in both genotypes but remained higher than BL values in Cyp24a1 nulls. By LL, nulls were still hypercalcemic vs WT, and had lost less mean whole body BMC (11% vs. 21%, p<0.02), but by micro-CT there were no differences from WT in cortical or trabecular bone mass. Lactational losses in BMC, cortical thickness, and trabecular number were restored by R4 in both genotypes. In summary, ablation of Cyp24a1 increased IntCaAbs and caused hypercalcemia during pregnancy and lactation, late gestational mortality in some nulls, and reduced lactational BMC loss. Treating women with gestational hypercalcemia from CYP24A1 mutations should focus on reducing calcitriol or IntCaAbs, since increased bone resorption is not the cause.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".