MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403310462 · doi:10.14740/jmc4314

A Rare Case of Systemic Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma With Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in an Immunocompetent Young Man: Potential Diagnostic Pitfall and Therapeutic Challenge

2024· article· en· W4403310462 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
S Liu, Sha Zhao, Yu Wu, Guang He

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosisEpstein–Barr virusLymphomaDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaVirusPathologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epstein-Barr virus-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (EBV + DLBCL) is an uncommon subtype of aggressive B-cell lymphoma, with both nodal and extranodal involvement being exceedingly rare. We present a unique case of a 32-year-old immunocompetent male with a nasopharynx lesion accompanied by fever and bilateral cervical lymphadenopathy. The initial biopsy from the nasopharynx proposed infectious mononucleosis (IM) as a potential diagnostic pitfall. The further discovery of lymph node and intestinal mucosa biopsies confirmed the diagnosis of systemic EBV + DLBCL. After receiving four cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) treatment, the patient got complete remission. However, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) developed following the fifth cycle of CHOP. The patient accepted allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) subsequently. Unfortunately, the survival time was only 14 months. Appeals for a multi-dimension approach to understanding more fully and improving the outcomes of such cases are underscored. J Med Cases. 2024;15(11):347-353 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jmc4314

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207