Myosin <scp>VI</scp> Is Associated With the Endoplasmic Reticulum in Regions of Sertoli Cells Containing Tubulobulbar Complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Myosin VI has been reported by others to localize in association with various regions of apical tubulobulbar complexes (TBCs) at sites of attachment between Sertoli cells and late spermatids in the mouse. Tubulobulbar complexes internalize "intact" intercellular junctions during sperm release and during spermatocyte translocation through the blood-testis barrier. Here, we use super-resolution (STED-stimulated emission depletion) and electron microscopy of immunolabeled sections of rat testis to clearly define the localization of anti-myosin VI reactivity both at apical and basal sites in the epithelium. In data stacks collected by STED imaging, staining at TBCs was predominantly associated with bulb regions of the complexes. At apical sites, when data stacks were analyzed with an Imaris software, staining appeared around and extended between adjacent bulbs. At basal sites, in addition to labeling at TBC bulbs, reactive sites appeared concentrated in regions close to but not directly associated with intercellular junctions. At the ultrastructural level, labeling was predominantly associated with cisternae of the endoplasmic reticulum associated with the bulbs of TBCs and near to basal junction complexes. We conclude that myosin VI may be associated with specific subdomains of the endoplasmic reticulum related to TBC bulbs and associated basal junction complexes between Sertoli cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".