MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403315861 · doi:10.1080/20964471.2024.2412379

Enhanced oceanic fog nowcasting through satellite-based recurrent neural networks

2024· article· en· W4403315861 on OpenAlexaff
Sahel Mahdavi, Meisam Amani, T. Bullock, Steven Beale

Bibliographic record

VenueBig Earth Data · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNowcastingSatelliteComputer scienceRemote sensingArtificial neural networkMeteorologyClimatologyArtificial intelligenceEnvironmental scienceGeologyGeographyEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The presence of fog in offshore regions poses significant hazards to navigation and aviation, making fog nowcasting indispensable for various industries, including oil and gas. This study presented a novel approach utilizing Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) within a deep learning framework to address this need. Leveraging geostationary GOES-16 satellite data from the summers of 2018 and 2019, fog maps were generated as input. The model incorporated Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory (ConvLSTM) layers and was trained with a unique loss function combining Minimum Squared Error (MSE) and structural DISSIMilarity (DSSIM) metrics. Validation results demonstrated an approximate 60% accuracy for both two-hour and three-hour nowcasting. Furthermore, evaluation against in-situ data from an offshore platform revealed a Probability of Detection (PoD) of 0.75 and False Alarm Rate (FAR) of 0.14 for two-hour nowcasting, PoD of 0.75 and FAR of 0.20 for three-hour nowcasting, and PoD of 0.70 and FAR of 0.20 for six-hour nowcasting. These findings suggested the operational viability of the proposed method for short-term fog forecasting in offshore environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBig Earth DataSame topicMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsFrench-language works237,207