Uterine mesenchymal tumours harboring the KAT6B/A::KANSL1 gene fusion represent a distinct type of uterine sarcoma based on DNA methylation profiles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Uterine mesenchymal tumours harboring KAT6B/A::KANSL1 gene fusions typically exhibit histological and immunophenotypic overlap with endometrial stromal and smooth muscle tumours. To date it remains uncertain whether such neoplasms should be regarded as variants of smooth muscle or endometrial stromal neoplasm, or if they constitute a distinct tumour type. In this study we investigated DNA methylation patterns and copy number variations (CNVs) in a series of uterine tumours harboring KAT6B/A::KANSL1 gene fusions in comparison to other mesenchymal neoplasms of the gynecological tract. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering and t-SNE analysis of DNA methylation data (Illumina EPIC array) identified a distinct cluster for 8/13 KAT6B/A::KANSL1 tumours (herein referred to as core cluster). The other 5 tumours (herein referred to as outliers) did not assign to the core cluster but clustered near various other tumour types. CNV analysis did not identify significant alterations in the core cluster. In contrast, various alterations, including deletions at the CDKN2A/B and NF1 loci were identified in the outlier group. Analysis of the DNA methylation clusters in relation to histological features revealed that while tumours in the core KAT6B/A::KANSL1 cluster were histologically bland, outlier tumours frequently exhibited "high-grade" histologic features in the form of significant nuclear atypia, increased mitotic activity and necrosis. Three of the five patients with outlier tumours died from their disease while clinical follow-up in the remaining two patients was limited (less than 12 months). In comparison, none of the 7 out of 8 patients with tumors in the core KAT6B/A::KANSL1 sarcoma cluster, where follow-up was available, died from disease. Furthermore, only 1 out of 7 patients recurred (mean follow-up of 30 months). In conclusion, KAT6B/A::KANSL1 uterine sarcoma is a molecularly unique type of uterine tumour that should be recognized as a distinct entity. These tumors typically exhibit low-grade histologic features but are occasionally morphologically high-grade; the latter have a DNA methylation profile different from the typical low-grade neoplasms and may be associated with aggressive behaviour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".