MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403322956 · doi:10.3171/2024.5.jns232204

Defining ideal middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysm size for Woven EndoBridge embolization

2024· article· en· W4403322956 on OpenAlexaff
Nimer Adeeb, Basel Musmar, Hamza Salim, Assala Aslan, Anika Alla, Nicole M Cancelliere, Rachel McLellan, Oktay Algın, Sherief Ghozy, Mahmoud Dibas, Sovann V. Lay, Adrien Guenego, Leonardo Renieri, Joseph A. Carnevale, Guillaume Saliou, Panagiotis Mastorakos, Kareem El Naamani, Eimad Shotar, Kévin Premat, Markus Möhlenbruch, Michael Kral, Omer Doron, Charlotte Chung, Mohamed M. Salem, Iván Lylyk, Paul M. Foreman, Jay A. Vachhani, Hamza Shaikh, Vedran Župančić, Muhammad Ubaid Hafeez, Joshua S. Catapano, Muhammad Waqas, Vincent M. Tutino, Mohamed K. Ibrahim, Marwa A. Mohammed, Mehmet Özgür Özateş, Gıyas Ayberk, James D. Rabinov, Yifan Ren, Clemens M. Schirmer, Mariangela Piano, Anna Luisa Kühn, Caterina Michelozzi, Stéphanie Elens, Robert M Starke, Ameer E Hassan, Mark Ogilvie, Anh Nguyên, Jesse Jones, Waleed Brinjikji, Marie Teresa Nawka, Marios Psychogios, Christian Ulfert, Jose Danilo Bengzon Diestro, Bryan Pukenas, Jan‐Karl Burkhardt, Ricardo A. Domingo, Thien Huynh, Juan Carlos Martínez-Gutiérrez, Muhammed Amir Essibayi, Sunil G. Sheth, Gary Spiegel, Rabih G. Tawk, Boris Lubicz, Pietro Panni, Ajit S Puri, Guglielmo Pero, Erez Nossek, Eytan Raz, Monika Killer-Oberfalzer, Christoph J. Griessenauer, Hamed Asadi, Adnan H. Siddiqui, Allan Brook, David Altschul, Andrew F. Ducruet, Felipe C. Albuquerque, Robert W. Regenhardt, Christopher J. Stapleton, Peter Kan, Vladimir Kalousek, Pedro Lylyk, Srikanth Boddu, Jared Knopman, Mohammad Ali Aziz‐Sultan, Stavropoula Tjoumakaris, Frédéric Clarençon, Nicola Limbucci, Hugo H. Cuellar-Saenz, Pascal Jabbour, Vítor Mendes Pereira, Aman B. Patel, Adam A. Dmytriw

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of neurosurgery · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAneurysmMedicineMiddle cerebral arteryOcclusionReceiver operating characteristicCutoffRadiologyEmbolizationNuclear medicineSurgeryInternal medicineIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device was approved to treat wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms. The device is designed as an intrasaccular flow disruptor covering aneurysm widths up to 10 mm. Although prior studies combined all aneurysm sizes, it is known that aneurysms behave differently in response to endovascular treatment based on their size. Therefore, the authors' objective was to identify ideal middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm width and neck sizes most suitable for WEB treatment. METHODS: The WorldWideWEB consortium is a large multicenter retrospective database that analyzes intracranial aneurysms treated with the WEB device. In this study, all unruptured MCA bifurcation aneurysms with available measurements were included. Cutoff values based on aneurysm width and neck in relation to aneurysm occlusion status were measured using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Propensity score matching (PSM) was then used to compare treatment outcomes between aneurysms smaller and larger than the cutoff value for both width and neck size. RESULTS: The ideal cutoff values for MCA bifurcation aneurysm width and neck were 6.1 mm and 4.6 mm, respectively. On PSM, 87 matched pairs were compared based on width size (≤ 6.1 mm and > 6.1 mm), and 77 matched pairs were compared based on neck size (≤ 4.6 mm and > 4.6 mm). There was a significant difference in adequate aneurysm occlusion between aneurysms smaller and larger than those cutoff values for both widths (93% vs 76%, p = 0.0017) and neck sizes (90% vs 70%, p = 0.0026). The retreatment rate was also significantly higher for larger aneurysms in both parameters. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that MCA bifurcation aneurysms ≤ 6.1 mm in width and ≤ 4.6 mm in neck size are significantly better candidates for WEB treatment, leading to improved occlusion status and reduced retreatment rate, which are important considerations when using WEB devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of neurosurgerySame topicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207