MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403323395 · doi:10.1017/ash.2024.117

Burden of Healthcare-Associated Infections in a Pediatric Intensive Care Setting Before, During, and After the Pandemic

2024· article· en· W4403323395 on OpenAlexaff
Meghan Engbretson, Josh Schaffzin, Dayre McNally, George Gubb, Nisha Thampi

Bibliographic record

VenueAntimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicHealth careIntensive careCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MedicineIntensive care medicinePolitical scienceInfectious disease (medical specialty)DiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Adult rates of non-COVID-19-related healthcare-associated infection (HAI) initially decreased and subsequently increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Little is known about pediatric HAI rates during this period. Methods: A retrospective review of HAIs was conducted for patients admitted to the intensive care unit (PICU) at a pediatric tertiary care hospital between January 1, 2019 and November 30, 2023. Patients who spent ≥48 hours in the PICU were included. Surgical site infections were excluded. Data were obtained from infection surveillance reports; each HAI was reviewed for validity and attribution based on National Healthcare Safety Network definitions. HAIs were grouped into 3 time periods: pre-pandemic (January 2019-February 2020), pandemic (March 2020- February 2022), and post-pandemic (March 2022-November 2023). Infection rate ratios were calculated for pre-pandemic and post-pandemic periods. Results: Among 2,959 PICU patients admitted during the study period, there were 60 HAI events (4.78 per 1,000 patient days). Rates generally remained steady throughout with slight increases and decreases between time periods (Table 1). There was no significant difference in CAUTI, CLABSI, or HAVRI rates noted in the PICU between pre-pandemic and post-pandemic periods despite a significantly higher device utilization ratio in the post-pandemic period for both urinary catheters and central lines (IRR, 0.89; p < 0 .05; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97). The most frequent HAI in all time periods was CAUTI. Conclusion: Unlike reports from adult centers, no significant variation between time periods was noted for HAIs in our pediatric center. Despite numerous COVID-19-related changes in infection prevention and control measures and contexts throughout the study period, HAI rates remained stable. This may be due in part to the lower burden of critically ill COVID-19 pediatric patients compared to adult populations. Additionally, this could indicate resiliency and consistency in practice among pediatric providers throughout the pandemic. Further evaluation of pediatric HAIs in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic may reveal practices that could be replicated elsewhere to control HAI rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAntimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare EpidemiologySame topicSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207