Numerical evaluation of ground source heat pumps in a thawing permafrost region
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Permafrost degradation poses significant environmental and geological challenges in Arctic and subarctic regions, particularly in areas like Umiujaq, Canada. The warming climate leads to thawing permafrost, causing ground instability, disrupting hydrology, and impacting local built environment. This study evaluates the use of Ground Source Heat Pump (GSHP) operation for mitigating ground subsidence in a permafrost region using a two-dimensional Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical (THM) coupled finite element analysis considering the ground poro-elastic and poro-plastic responses. The research uses a single-well scenario to demonstrate the interactions among thermal, hydraulic, and mechanical processes. The impact of GSHP operation under different temperature management strategies, including a scenario with a constant GSHP temperature of -5 °C throughout the year is numerically investigated. Results indicate that GSHP operation exacerbates ground deformation near the borehole, particularly during winter months. However, maintaining GSHP operation throughout the entire year can mitigate extreme subsidence fluctuations, leading to a more stable subsurface environment. While GSHP systems provide effective thermal regulation, their operation can introduce mechanical stresses that potentially disturb the ground close to the borehole. Therefore, careful design, operation, and further research are essential to balance thermal benefits with ground stability in permafrost regions. • Using ground source heat pump for energy generation in permafrost is evaluated. • The performance of thawing permafrost is examined based on finite element modeling. • Preferred heat pump operation time for a stable ground is recommended.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it