OODNet: A deep blind JPEG image compression deblocking network using out-of-distribution detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
JPEG is one of the most popular image compression techniques , with numerous applications ranging from medical imaging to surveillance systems. Since JPEG introduces the blocking artifacts to the decompressed visual signals, enhancing the quality of these images is of paramount importance . Recently, various deep neural networks have been proposed for JPEG image deblocking that can effectively reduce the blocking artifacts produced by the JPEG compression technique. However, most of these schemes could only handle decompressed images generated by a set of specific JPEG quality factor (QF) values employed in the network training process. Therefore, when the images are obtained by the JPEG QF values other than those used in the network training process, the performance of deep learning-based JPEG image deblocking schemes drops significantly. To address this, in this paper, we propose a novel deep learning-based blind JPEG image deblocking method, which employs out-of-distribution detection to perform deblocking efficiently for various quality factor (QF) values. The proposed scheme can distinguish between the decompressed images using the QF values used in the training set and those using the QF values not used in the training set, and then, a suitable deblocking strategy for generating high-quality images is developed. The proposed scheme is shown to outperform the state-of-the-art JPEG image deblocking methods for various QF values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".