MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403332258 · doi:10.1109/icfec61590.2024.00012

A Real-World Testbed for V2X in Autonomous Vehicles: From Simulation to Actual Road Testing

2024· article· en· W4403332258 on OpenAlexaff
Khalid Elgazzar, Sanaa Alwidian

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTestbedComputer scienceSimulationReal-time computingComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes an edge computing-enhanced testbed for Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) communication, using a scaled autonomous vehicle model. Addressing the limitations of traditional vehicle testing and simulations, our approach utilizes an F1Tenth scale vehicle to replicate real-world traffic scenarios, with a focus on non-line-of-sight and pedestrian-occluded challenges. The testbed incorporates a Road Side Unit (RSU) for edge-based data processing, allowing rapid data acquisition and transmission. Our controlled experiments assess the vehicle's response to V2X communication in complex environments specifically in NLOS scenarios such as occluded pedestrians, highlighting the potential of edge computing to augment autonomous vehicle perception and decision-making. Performance evaluation shows that the vehicle can effectively handle emergencies, achieving an end-to-end response time of less than 146 ms on an edge device. Compared to other popular autonomy frameworks, which rely on higher computational units unsuitable for deployment on edge devices. This study advances V2X technology in edge computing contexts for autonomous vehicles and paves the way for future research in robust, safe, and reliable autonomous systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyFrench-language works237,207