MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403333033 · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad7b9e

The Discovery of Three Pulsars in the Globular Cluster M15 with FAST

2024· article· en· W4403333033 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yuxiao Wu, Zhichen Pan, Lei Qian, S. M. Ransom, Ralph P. Eatough, Bojun Wang, P. C. C. Freire, Kuo Liu, Zhen Yan, Jintao Luo, Liyun Zhang, Minghui Li, Dejiang Yin, Baoda Li, Yifeng Li, Yinfeng Dai, Yaowei Li, Xinnan Zhang, Tong Liu, Yu Pan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYouth Innovation Promotion AssociationNatural Science Foundation of ChongqingNational Science FoundationYouth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchChinese Academy of Sciences
KeywordsGlobular clusterPulsarCluster (spacecraft)PhysicsAstronomyAstrophysicsComputer scienceStarsProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present the discovery of three pulsars in the globular cluster (GC) M15 (NGC 7078) by the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Radio Telescope. PSR J2129+1210J (M15J) is a millisecond pulsar with a spin period of 11.84 ms and a dispersion measure of 66.68 pc cm−3. Both PSR J2129+1210K and L (M15K and L) are long-period pulsars with spin periods of 1928 ms and 3961 ms, respectively. M15L is the GC pulsar with the longest spin period known. We update the timing solutions of M15A to M15H. As predicted by A. Ridolfi et al., the flux density of M15C keeps decreasing, and the latest detection in our data set was on 2022 December 20. We have also detected M15I’s signal for the first time since its discovery. Current timing suggests that it is an isolated pulsar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal LettersSame topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207