MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Toward Robust Automated Cardiovascular Arrhythmia Detection using Self-supervised Learning and 1-Dimensional Vision Transformers

2024· preprint· en· W4403333782 on OpenAlexfundno aff
M Chatterjee, Adrian D. C. Chan, Majid Komeili

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceCardiac arrhythmiaTransformerComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)Machine learningEngineeringMedicineCardiologyElectrical engineeringAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiovascular diseases are the primary cause of death globally. With the prevalence of electrocardiogram (ECG) machines within and outside the clinical environment, it is now possible to passively monitor a patient's heartbeat for cardiovascular diseases. The goal of this work is to emphasize the importance of selfsupervised learning for arrhythmia detection, leveraging the large amounts of unlabelled data recently made publicly available and demonstrating significant performance improvements as it reduces overfitting to class imbalance and noise. We propose Masked Patch Modelling (MPM) and leverage 8.2 million unlabelled ECGs to perform large-scale self-supervised pre-training and create a foundational 1dimensional Transformer model, PatchECG, that can be fine-tuned for any downstream tasks involving ECG data. We obtain state-of-the-art results on standard benchmark datasets, including PTB-XL multi-label classification, while setting new benchmarks on the largest and highest quality multi-label classification dataset to date. We find that PatchECG outperforms the current state-of-the-art with regard to computational efficiency, requiring only 1/5 of the computational resources while increasing model capacity by a factor of 14. We also compare the 1-dimensional PatchECG model to a state-of-the-art 2-dimensional vision Transformer and observe significantly higher performance. Finally, we perform ablation studies to investigate other methods for addressing the critical issues incurred with automated arrhythmia detection, resulting in a performance improvement of more than 2% under conditions of class imbalance, label noise, and over-parameterization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.460
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207