MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403333878 · doi:10.1145/3654777.3676448

HoloChemie - Sustainable Fabrication of Soft Biochemical Holographic Devices for Ubiquitous Sensing

2024· article· en· W4403333878 on OpenAlexaff
Sutirtha Roy, Moshfiq-Us-Saleheen Chowdhury, Jurjaan Onayza Noim, Richa Pandey, Aditya Shekhar Nittala

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFabricationHolographyComputer scienceMaterials scienceNanotechnologyOpticsPhysicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sustainable fabrication approaches and biomaterials are increasingly being used in HCI to fabricate interactive devices. However, the majority of the work has focused on integrating electronics. This paper takes a sustainable approach to exploring the fabrication of biochemical sensing devices. Firstly, we contribute a set of biochemical formulations for biological and environmental sensing with bio-sourced and environment-friendly substrate materials. Our formulations are based on a combination of enzymes derived from bacteria and fungi, plant extracts and commercially available chemicals to sense both liquid and gaseous analytes: glucose, lactic acid, pH levels and carbon dioxide. Our novel holographic sensing scheme allows for detecting the presence of analytes and enables quantitative estimation of the analyte levels. We present a set of application scenarios that demonstrate the versatility of our approach and discuss the sustainability aspects, its limitations, and the implications for bio-chemical systems in HCI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsFrench-language works237,207