MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403335078 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.134420

Gallery of soft modes: Theory and experiment at a ferromagnetic quantum phase transition

2024· article· en· W4403335078 on OpenAlexafffund
P. C. E. Stamp, D. M. Silevitch, Matthew Libersky, R. D. McKenzie, Alexandra A. Geim, T. F. Rosenbaum

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum and electron transport phenomena
Canadian institutionsPacific Institute for the Mathematical SciencesUniversity of British Columbia
FundersAmes LaboratoryBasic Energy SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaIowa State UniversityU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsQuantum decoherenceQuantum phase transitionQuantumQuantum gravityQuantum dissipationQuantum mechanicsQuantum field theoryPhotonPhase transitionPhononQuantum opticsSoft modesCatastrophe theoryIsing modelQuantum electrodynamicsCondensed matter physicsTheoretical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spectral divergences have long been important in physics, from the 19th century UV catastrophe to IR divergences in modern quantum field theory. In all these, ``feedback'' mechanisms quell the divergences. But what if multiple IR divergences -- soft photons, phonons, and electronuclear magnons -- conspire to produce finite decoherence at a quantum phase transition? The authors develop here the theory for these cancelling divergences and experimentally observe the resulting mode softening in a quantum Ising magnet, with implications from condensed matter to quantum gravity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicQuantum and electron transport phenomenaFrench-language works237,207