MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403335593 · doi:10.3390/agriculture14101785

A Multi-View Real-Time Approach for Rapid Point Cloud Acquisition and Reconstruction in Goats

2024· article· en· W4403335593 on OpenAlexaff
Yi Sun, Qifeng Li, Weihong Ma, Mingyu Li, Anne de La Torre, Simon X. Yang, Chunjiang Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueAgriculture · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersBeijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences
KeywordsPoint cloudComputer scienceCloud computingNoise (video)Point (geometry)Data acquisitionComputer visionRemote sensingExtraction (chemistry)Real-time computingArtificial intelligenceSimulationAlgorithmMathematicsGeographyImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The body size, shape, weight, and scoring of goats are crucial indicators for assessing their growth, health, and meat production. The application of computer vision technology to measure these parameters is becoming increasingly prevalent. However, in real farm environments, obstacles, such as fences, ground conditions, and dust, pose significant challenges for obtaining accurate goat point cloud data. These obstacles lead to difficulties in rapid data extraction and result in incomplete reconstructions, causing substantial measurement errors. To address these challenges, we developed a system for real-time, non-contact acquisition, extraction, and reconstruction of goat point clouds using three depth cameras. The system operates in a scenario where goats walk naturally through a designated channel, and bidirectional distributed triggering logic is employed to ensure real-time acquisition of the point cloud. We also designed a noise recognition and filtering method tailored to handle complex environmental interferences found on farms, enabling automatic extraction of the goat point cloud. Furthermore, a distributed point cloud completion algorithm was developed to reconstruct missing sections of the goat point cloud caused by unavoidable factors such as railings and dust. Measurements of body height, body slant length, and chest circumference were calculated separately with deviation of no more than 25 mm and an average error of 3.1%. The system processes each goat in an average time of 3–5 s. This method provides rapid and accurate extraction and complementary reconstruction of 3D point clouds of goats in motion on real farms, without human intervention. It offers a valuable technological solution for non-contact monitoring and evaluation of goat body size, weight, shape, and appearance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgricultureSame topicAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207