MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403353431 · doi:10.29173/mm25

Pinky-Links and Eye Contact: How the Use of Pre-Competitive Routines Changed My Coaching Practices

2024· article· en· W4403353431 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Suzanne Landers

Bibliographic record

VenueMovement Matters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicTeam Dynamics and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoachingEye contactPsychologyKnowledge managementComputer scienceCommunicationPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a volleyball coach, my training approach has often relied on reproducing what I saw others do. Consequently, in this study, my purpose was to transform my own coaching practices with a U16 volleyball team. Through my learning during a post-graduate course-based Master’s degree, I became fascinated with pre-competitive (PC) routines and the potential they have to improve athletes’ positive psychological states during training and competition. I employed an iterative Action Research (AR) process to facilitate my learning and application of different PC routine approaches. Specifically, I aimed to challenge myself to examine critically not only my planning and implementation of PC routines (what I did), but also how this process helped me learn to become a more conscientious coach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMovement MattersSame topicTeam Dynamics and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207